Woolite Delicate He Detergent

arable land is now in Cambodia? - Clear and then we make biofuel

In Germany and in all EU-Eastern Europe, a new fuel is forced into the market: biofuel E 10

It consists of 10% bioethanol, which is produced from food. Because it
ideologoisch-politically intended. Not just biodiesel, which has been around longer, but more and gasoline.

In Absurdistan is discussed at engine compatibility and reduced costs, such as here:
http://www.politikforen.net/showthread.php?t=107496

Quote: Posted by German man nonsense. E10 ruined no engine. The people fall back rows gullible. Now you have to look for "only" an idiot who is liable for it if the promises of government and industry wrong. The new engine will pay you either the car manufacturers nor the government if he should die because the new fuel. And then there will also certainly have nothing (in court) to prove . But our politicians are now living happy times with the motto: No risk, no fun! (When the risk not have to bear)

Yes these serious problems ... ts ts ts.

ADAC and others find that biofuel ineffective is therefore higher consumption, and therefore ultimately I would be more expensive than conventional 10 SUPER. Normal is probably also no more?

The reason for the addition of ethanol to gasoline to diesel and methyl esters, however, is not a necessity, caused by lack of fossil oil, but it is an ideological "CO2-cutting" measure. Believe it or announce it at least.

E10-waste gasoline: More expensive and less

of Ralph Bärligea

As the EU plan reduces economic prosperity, hunger deaths and provoked environmental destruction

Like all economic planning The new measures also harms the environment and E10 fuel reduces the welfare of society. Despite consumer boycott of the new scrap-fuel E10 is now to use force against the will of providers and consumers are introduced, accompanied by so-called "information campaigns" that are either subsidized or government-enforced by the state. . This is about propaganda, because nothing you say about the new E10 fuel is true ef-magazin.de

detection by tests:

E10-consumption test with the VW Golf 1.4 TSI
	city traffic and highway	full throttle	constant 140 km / h
premium gasoline		6.3 liters 21.0 liters 9.5 liters
New E10 Fuel	6.6 liters	22.2 liters 9.8 liters
consumption	+ 0.3 liter	+ 1.2 liter 0.3 liter

consuming test-e10-vw-golf- 1.4-tsi comes out in about 5% more.




And what has the contact with Cambodia to do?

E10 fuel

The tale of the Prima-air-fuel

From Markus Becker

AP

deforestation in Indonesia: Palm oil plantations for biofuel production displace rainforest

The driver of the controversial biofuel E10 do not fill up, it's a fiasco for policy and oil companies - but a blessing for the environment believe, researchers and conservationists. They castigate the biofuel operation for years as nonsense. spiegel.de

Already Sigmar Gabriel (SPD) came as federal environment minister several times with the experts together as he pursued his plans for biofuel production. In March 2008, the Scientific Advisory Board for Agricultural Policy in a comprehensive report had stated what he thinks of biodiesel and bioethanol production from German: nothing . The alleged eco-fuel is compared to other climate policy are costly and useless. Measured on a hectare of cultivated area in this way will simply save too little carbon dioxide.

In December 2008, the Scientific Advisory Council on Global Change (WBGU) to the study "Sustainable bio-energy and sustainable land use" section. Your crystal clear recommendation: The federal government should stop the law for incorporation of biofuels, driving the share of the supposed eco-Sprits on gasoline to zero and stop all funding . "Let's be the nonsense!"

quote END

... but politics is and has always been resistant to reason: Green ideology rather than common sense. Whether SPD or CDU, total care ...

And what your doing now with the to Cambodia?

Zoff at the pump

food groups warn against biofuel

Unilever boss Paul Polmann sees rising food prices as "perverse consequence" high biofuel subsidies. scientists warn: Green Fuel is a climate killer.

By Marcus Theurer, London

soybean plants in a field in Brazil

02 March 2011

The President of Nestlé will not fill up biofuel . "absolute madness at the expense of the poorest of the poor" is the use of crops for the production of biodiesel, scolded Peter Brabeck-Letmathe in a recent interview with this newspaper. Especially in Europe and the United States encourage the politicians biofuels for climate protection and concern for the growing dependence on oil imports.

The Swiss company (Maggi, KitKat, Alete) is not the only food giant, which criticized the derived primarily from corn, sugar cane, rapeseed and soybean biofuels sharp. Rising food prices have reached the danger zone, warns Paul Polmann, head of the rival Unilever (Knorr, Pfanni, Bifi) and provides the buoyancy to as the "perverse effect" of high bio-fuel subsidies in developed countries.

a

© FAZ exploding food prices, the people starve. Also in Cambodia. And for what? For stupid policy in Europe and North America .

The World Bank estimates that in the United States are now used almost 30 percent of corn acreage for the production of fuel from bio-alcohol. In Europe, production has also rapidly increased. The policy will have it so: According to the IEA will be promoted globally no other form of renewable energies. flowed 2009 a total of $ 20 billion in subsidies in the form of tax rebates. But the EU countries spent 7.9 billion U.S. dollars

also writes the Swiss NZZ.

Then there's nothing left to eat "

Nestlé chief Peter Brabeck warned in an interview before condemns agro-fuels

Peter Brabeck promotion of agro-fuel.

(Picture: Reuters)

Nestlé CEO Peter Brabeck is against the subsidization of agro-fuels, which are made from soy and wheat. About one hundred million tons of grain are expected to consume this year in the U.S. alone for this purpose.

If the U.S. use this year 138 million tons of corn for biofuel is missing, this quantity of food production and intensified the struggle for land. This means that not only the price of corn goes into the air, but also those for soybeans and wheat. Agricultural land is a scarce resource. Similarly, water that we be considered threatened. order to produce 1 liter of ethanol, you need 4000 liters of water!
Water is the bigger problem than CO2 emissions.

Saudi Arabia has announced two weeks ago to export no more wheat. Kazakhstan, a traditional granary, and Argentina want to restrict wheat exports. The wheat price has soared whether these messages in a single day by 24% in the air.

If the wheat trade is a kind of virtual water trade?

That's right. Therefore, it is irresponsible and morally unacceptable that huge subsidies pays to make biofuel from food. If you want to cover 20% of the increase in oil demand with biofuels, as is planned, then there's nothing left to eat

. This is political insanity.

unquote NZZ.

buy farmland in Cambodia, and produce biofuel instead of food:

Then they have good yields and good person ROYAL pillow, because then they cut to save sooo much CO2 and the world.

Dass dabei neue Hungerkatasprophen entstehen, und neben ihrer Farm Kinder verhungern durch stark steigende Reispreise, das verweisen sie einfach in das Reich der Fabeln und Märchen.

And what your doing now with the to Cambodia?

Savin said since a few months that the prices of rice and meat are constantly increasing.
She claims by 25-30% in just one year, but they certainly can not count only just;)